Chaucers Canterbury Tales - Importance of Order in Knights Tale Essa

The Importance of Order in Knights yarn Chaucer claims to place the Knights Tale just after the General Prologue by chance, the drawing of lots. The Knight draws the myopic pale yellow, and all are glad for it. The appropriateness of his lengthy tale to succeed is clear on some levels, and barely perceptible on others. I intend to launch my investigation of the Knights Tale with a scrutiny of these common chord statements, and perhaps we shall find an kindle conclusion in this, albeit a problematic one. The honor adapted Host, Harry Bailey, begins this famous day of pilgrimage by concern everyone together to draw lots, He which that hath the shorteste shal beginne. (838) He environs the Knight to draw first, presumably as a gesture of respect, as he refers to the Knight as master and lord. Harry continues to speak for a short moment, as we encounter the visual image of the Knight stepping up to claim his straw. The host continues to call up two more pilgrims, but quickly decides that everyone might as well draw in a free-for-all. And surprise The Knight finds himself safekeeping the short cut. Is it possible that Harry managed to give the Knight the short straw intentionally? Now draweth cut, says he, for that is myn accord (840). A close eye whitethorn suggest some punning going on in that crinkle Now draw the cut (short) straw, for it is my wish. The words cord and accord were two used in Middle English, so we may be able to find some double meaning there as well. If thence Harry wishes to give the Knight the cord, there are several interesting cases to think on a) the cord is simply the short straw, b) the cord is the hangmans rope, or c) the cord is a unit of wood cut for fuel. The hangmans rope would concord for subtle sarcasm, but... ... immediate effects on the milling machine, who cares not a subroutine for courtesy or order but only reckless lust. Hence, the Miller follows with a tale that Palamon could have appreciated, had he not k nown the slipway of chivalry, but only those of lechery. Works Cited and ConsultedBenson, Larry D., ed. The Riverside Chaucer. Boston Houghton Mifflin, 1987.Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. The Norton Anthologyof English Literature. 7th Edition. Two Volumes. Ed. M. H. Abrams. NewYork Norton, 2000.Cooper, Helen. The Structure of The Canterbury Tales. Athens U of Georgia P, 1983.Modern vital Views Geoffrey Chaucer, Ed. Harold Bloom. New York Chelsea House Publishers, 1985.Spearing, A.C. Chaucer The Knights Tale. Cambridge Cambridge UP, 1995. Williams, David. The Canterbury Tales, A Literary Pilgrimage. Boston Twayne Publishers, 1987.